Friday, September 02, 2011

$159,300,000,000 The Price of War!

Yesterday, the Commission on Wartime Contracting released its final report.

The Commission reported that between $31 billion and $62 billion of the tax money spent on contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan has been wasted.  It also said that between $10 billion and $19 billion of what contractors billed and received was fraudulent.  In fact, $360 million of our tax dollars went straight to . . . the Taliban.

Wow.  Who could have imagined that?

Well . . . me.

When I saw that the Bush Administration was doing nothing about fraud in Iraq, I revived a law going back to the Civil War that allowed whistleblowers to bring lawsuits in the name of the U.S. Government.  I filed case after case, which were promptly greeted by the Bush Administration with gag orders – gag orders that they kept in place for years.  They didn’t want any more bad news coming out of Iraq.

So I went on CNN, spoke to the New York Times and the Washington Post, and told America whatever I could say without violating those gag orders.  And when the Bush Administration finally let one case out from under those gag orders – and declined to prosecute it – I took that case to trial, and won a $14 million judgment.  It was the third-largest judgment for whistleblowers in the 143-year history of that law.

Those contractors built bases without hooking up the plumbing.  A general testified that when he went there, he felt like throwing up.

The Wall Street Journal reported in a front-page article that I was “waging a one-man war against contractor fraud in Iraq.”  The national organization Taxpayers Against Fraud named me “Lawyer of the Year.”  And people started to think, “what is going on over there?”

In Congress, I spoke out against the wars, and I voted against the wars.  I wrote and introduced The War is Making You Poor Act, HR 5353.  My bill pointed out that you could:

  1. Require the Pentagon to fund the wars from its own budget of over $500 billion, not supplemental appropriations;
  2. Take all the money that would save and eliminate taxes on everyone’s first $35,000 of income, $70,000 for married couples; and
  3. Still have over $10 billion a year left over, to cut the federal deficit.

Open Congress’s unscientific poll showed 91% in favor of HR 5353.

After I left Congress in January, I took up the work against contractor fraud in Iraq again.  And I won an $8.7 million settlement from DynCorp and the Sandi Group.  The defendants paid our attorney’s fees last Friday.

Here’s some simple arithmetic.  We’ve budgeted $159.3 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan this year, through next month.  (The true cost is much more, but let’s leave that aside.)  That’s:

$159,300,000,000.00.

You could take all that money and create 5,310,000 jobs here in America paying $30,000 a year, rebuilding our bridges, our roads, our schools, instead of the ones in Iraq and Afghanistan.  That would immediately lower the unemployment rate from 9 percent to 5.5 percent, and get money flowing in our communities again.

Now, that’s a job program.  I’ll put that up against whatever President Obama proposes next week.

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have killed more than 8,000 Americans, and who-knows-how-many Iraqis and Afghans.  War has destroyed our economy, just as the war in Afghanistan destroyed the Soviet economy.  According to the calculations of Nobel Prize-winner Professor Joseph Stiglitz, the war in Iraq alone has cost us around 8% of our $50 trillion national net worth, all of the wealth that America built up over two centuries.  Over $13,000 for every single American, young and old.

We’ve taken our inheritance, and dumped it into a wood chipper.

My father served in the U.S. Army during World War II.  He told me once that one of the most common questions that men of his generation heard was, “what did you do in the war?”  Maybe our children will ask us, “what did you do against the war?”

That’s a question I can answer.

Courage,

Alan Grayson

*

yd62004_created  Locke Lord Losers Update

As many of our regular reader friends are aware Our Lobbyist, Lawyer friends at Locke Lord have been busy convincing our elected officials to “offshore” your tax dollars to the government of Pakistan.

Don’t believe me?  Here ya go!

Pakistan pays U.S. lobbyists to deny it helped bin Laden  (Reuters)

Pakistan Taps Locke Lord for Lobbying Work Following OBL Fallout  (Am Law Daily)

*

Public Citizen's 'Money and Democracy Update'

an e-newsletter about the movement to curb corporate influence in politics and restore our democracy

Issue #76 • September 2, 2011
“Money and Democracy Update” is Public Citizen’s weekly e-newsletter about the intersection of money and politics. It is part of our ongoing campaign to track the results of — and ultimately overturn — the U.S. Supreme Court’s reckless decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which allows for-profit corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money to support or attack political candidates. We’ll update you regularly with select news stories and blog posts, legislative developments and ways to get involved.
Stunning Statistics of the Week:

  • 25: The percent of his money that presidential candidate Mitt Romney has raised this year from the finance, insurance and real estate sector
  • $4.65 million: The amount in dollars that he has raised from that sector
  • 10: The percent of his money that has come from the general business sector
  • $1 of every $20: The ratio of money that has been donated to Romney by lawyers and lobbyists

Super PACs are fundamentally changing presidential campaigns
Super PACs are starting to rival the fundraising operations of candidates in size and scope, The New York Times reports. This is setting off a fundraising arms race that is
fundamentally shifting the way presidential campaigns are run.
$52 steaks, gin and cucumber puree
When AT&T was seeking U.S. approval for its merger with T-Mobile USA,
it went into overdrive to fete congressional lawmakers and raise money for their campaign coffers, Bloomberg News reports. The lawmakers dined on $52 steaks and sipped $15 drinks made of gin and cucumber puree. AT&T’s political action committee has given hundreds of thousands of dollars to lawmakers, and the company has hired the top lobbyists in town, including firms headed by former U.S. Sens. John Breaux (D-La.) and Trent Lott (R-Miss.), and former U.S. Rep. J.C. Watts (R-Okla.).
Draft executive order on disclosure is MIA
Whatever happened to that draft executive order on disclosure that we heard so much about in the spring? This is the order that would require companies vying for federal contracts to disclose their political contributions. Good government groups are clamoring for it to be enacted. Says the White House,
it is still undergoing review.
While we’re on the topic … SEC mulling disclosure proposal
Ten law professors are urging the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to require corporations to disclose political contributions in annual proxy statements. The SEC is
mulling over a proposal that would require public companies to disclose their political contributions. Many say it’s good, but doesn’t go far enough.
How quickly they change
A number of members of the House of Representatives who promised voters they would change the way Washington works appear to have fallen onto the same
reward-thy-funders rhythm as their colleagues, USA Today has found. These freshmen have been pushing legislation that could benefit their most generous campaign contributors.
Visit DemocracyIsForPeople.org to learn more!

To get regular e-alerts about opportunities for activism and other ways to help with Public Citizen’s work, sign up for the Public Citizen Action Network. To unsubscribe, go to http://action.citizen.org/unsubscribe.jsp.

Contribute | © 2011 Public Citizen | Take Action

“Partners in Crime”

Or

Complicit in the Facts?

You Decide

sedgbeast_clients